Ozmen photo

Tire reviews & comparisons

Ozmen

Hi Folks. I'm Ozmen, and I work as a tire designer. I understand finding a tire isn't easy, as there are so many variables involved. But with me around, tire selection would never bother you again.

Start Here About Ozmen
BF Goodrich KO3 Sidewalls

BFGoodrich KO3 vs KO2 – Detailed Comparison

In conclusion, the BF Goodrich KO3 tire outperforms the KO2 across various parameters. It offers better longitudinal grip and handling traction due to an optimized contact patch and improved tread design, leading to enhanced stability and steering response. The KO3 also shows significant advancements in wet performance with better water absorption and evacuation, resulting in improved wet braking and handling. In snowy conditions, the KO3's evolved design provides better grip and flexibility. The tire also reduces tread noise more effectively and maintains its performance more consistently over time due to its higher silica content and lighter structure. And although the KO2 excels in rocky terrains, the KO3 performs better in sand and mud driving. So overall its pretty much a win for the newer updated tire.

Buick Envista

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 vs Primacy MXM4

Overall, each tire has its unique advantages, making them suitable for different priorities and conditions. In dry conditions, the PSAS4's superior linear grip, handling, and steering response outshine the MXM4, especially in braking and cornering. This performance advantage is credited to its streamlined ribs and lighter build. And in wet, the MXM4 takes the lead in hydroplaning resistance while the Pilot Sport provides superior traction. Lastly, in terms of driving comfort, the Primacy MXM4 emerges superior. Its sophisticated tread pattern reduces road noise, while its unique polymer blend and specialized construction effectively absorb road vibrations, offering a smoother, more comfortable ride compared to the more performance-oriented PSAS4.

Blue Fusion

Falken EuroAll Season AS210 vs Nokian SeasonProof

As we conclude, it becomes clear that selecting an overall better tire is complex, with each leading in different performance areas. The Falken AS210 exhibits superior performance in dry conditions, notably in terms of linear grip and handling. Its lighter weight and tread design contribute to faster stopping and better cornering, evidenced by shorter stopping distances and quicker lap times. In wet conditions, however, the SeasonProof outperforms, particularly in hydroplaning resistance and wet traction, due to its effective groove structure and sipes. When considering value, the EuroAll AS210 stands out for its affordability, durability, and fuel efficiency, making it an excellent budget option despite its slightly lesser performance in winter conditions. On the other hand, the Nokian tire excels in winter performance, offering significantly better capabilities in snow and ice, attributed to its specialized siping and flexible rubber composition.

All New Falken Wildpeak AT4W

Falken Wildpeak AT4W Detailed Review

So in conclusion, the Falken WildPeak AT4w shows improvements in certain areas such as dry performance, tread longevity, and durability, with a stiffer design and the use of Kevlar enhancing its overall performance. However, it falls short in wet traction, winter performance on ice, and off-road traction on sandy dunes compared to its predecessor, the Wildpeak AT3w. Despite its heavier build, it maintains similar fuel economy due to its stiffer lugs and design. Overall, while the AT4w excels in some aspects, it still has areas that require improvement to match or surpass the performance of the AT3w.

Kia Forte LX

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Weather Control A005 Evo

In conclusion let me start by saying that the suitable tire here hinges on your preferences, as each has its own distinct advantages. The new AS6 shows marginal improvements in dry braking due to its optimized contact patch and higher rubber-to-voids ratio. And in wet conditions, it outperforms in braking but falls slightly behind in hydroplaning resistance to Weather Control Evo. For winter performance, both tires excel, with the newer tire having a slight edge on icy surfaces, and the predecessor still providing superior snow traction. In terms of ride comfort, Bridgestone's newer tire provides better overall ride quality, though still needs to improve its auditory performance. Other than this, Turanza All Season 6 does a better job in terms of fuel economy and tread life, with some noticeable, and appreciable improvements.

BFG Advantage on Subaru CrossTrek

BF Goodrich Advantage Control vs General Altimax RT45

So what's the verdict here? Well it's a game of trade-offs. The Altimax RT45 leads in dry performance, particularly in braking and handling, thanks to its robust central ribs and advanced tread design. Whereas in wet conditions, the Advantage Control edges ahead with its superior siping and Aqua-Flume Technology, offering better water evacuation and traction. And in winter scenarios, the Altimax provides better handling, but lacks to BFG in terms of traction. Other than this, both tires are closely matched in terms of overall comfort, longevity and fuel economy.

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

In conclusion, both boys here provide some nice performance aspects. The CrossClimate 2 provides superb braking, and nose reduction, both attributable to its rounded contact patch. Plus the tire also provides superior wet performance, particularly in terms of hydroplaning. The Pirelli Verde All Season on the other side, provides just as great of the dry handling and similar impact comfort performance compared to Michelin's tire. Though the tire clearly leads in terms of fuel economy and tread longevity (even though it comes in the SUV touring category), compared to grand touring CrossClimate.

Tested on Ford Explorer

Bridgestone Turanza QuietTrack vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

In summary, both boys here offer distinct advantages and compromises in various aspects of tire performance. The Turanza QuietTrack, with its stiffer rubber and lighter weight, excels in fuel efficiency, noise reduction, lateral grip, and wear resistance, notably through its QuietTrack Technology and innovative tread design. On the other hand, the CrossClimate 2, designed with softer tread for winter conditions, outperforms in impact comfort, directional grip, wet performance, and winter performance, owing to its directional tread pattern, interlocking lugs, and greater tread depth. So, while the Michelin demonstrates superior handling in wet and winter conditions, the Bridgestone shines in terms of overall comfort, noise reduction, and longevity, making each tire suitable for different priorities in all-season driving.

Tested on Honda Accord

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

So which tire to choose here? Well it's a game of trade-offs. I mean with both tires having unique strengths you can't really declare a clear winner here. The CrossClimate 2 sets a high bar in dry braking with its unique tread design and excels in snow and ice performance, thanks to its strategic sipe arrangement and thermal adaptability. However, it falls a bit short in wet handling and mid-cornering due to its tread pattern and sipe design. In contrast, the AllSeasonContact 2 shines in wet conditions and hydroplaning resistance, attributed to its effective groove structure and sipe arrangement, but its heavier construction affects its mid-cornering performance. Both tires offer comparable noise reduction and ride smoothness, with the Michelin having an edge in vibration damping due to its polyurethane foam layer. And yes both tires also come out with similar tread longevity.

Tesla Model 3

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

So, when it all comes down to it, comparing these tires isn’t straightforward as each has areas where they outshine the other. The Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 excels in dry performance with better braking and handling, while the AllSeasonContact 2 leads in wet conditions with superior hydroplaning resistance and grip. In winter conditions, Goodyear performs better on ice, and Continental is more effective in snow. Moreover, the 4Seasons tire is quieter and more durable due to its design and materials, though both tires offer similar comfort levels.

Nokian WRG4

Nokian WRG4 vs Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady

In conclusion, when navigating the varied landscape of tire performance, both boys present their strengths. The Assurance WeatherReady offers a compelling blend of durability, quieter ride, and reduced rolling resistance for fuel efficiency, shining particularly in dry conditions and on snow. Meanwhile, the WRG4 stands out with superior ice traction, wet handling, and a smooth ride, thanks to its innovative tread design and siping. So while both tires yield decent all-season capabilities and snow ratings, your choice might boil down to specific needs. I mean, whether you prioritize longevity and quiet comfort with Goodyear or the enhanced grip and smoothness on wet and icy surfaces with Nokian. Ultimately, both tires are robust contenders, each with a unique set of features catering to a variety of driving conditions.

4Seasons on Mercedez Benz A200d

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

So wrapping up, it all says for itself that both tires have distinct advantages in their performance capabilities. The CrossClimate 2 offers exceptional dry and wet braking, though lacks behind in terms of handling due to its lagging steering responsiveness and cornering grip. Basically the Vector 4Seasons's lighter and more rigid design contributes to its superior performance here. And yes it also provides this tire with better fuel economy and tread longevity. The CC2 on the other hand, provides better ride comfort due to its innovative polyurethane foam layer and softer rubber compound, enhancing noise reduction and vibration absorption. And yes it also takes the lead in overall winter performance.

1 2 3 … 49