Ozmen photo

Tire reviews & comparisons

Ozmen

Hi Folks. I'm Ozmen, and I work as a tire designer. I understand finding a tire isn't easy, as there are so many variables involved. But with me around, tire selection would never bother you again.

Start Here About Ozmen
Falken Wildpeak AT4W

BFGoodrich KO3 vs Falken Wildpeak AT4W

So overall, both tires here have their particular strengths and weaknesses. In dry conditions, the BF Goodrich performs better with superior grip and handling, while the Falken tire lags slightly due to its aggressive tread and weight. Though in wet condition, opposite happens, and here Wildpeak takes the lead. In winter performance, both tires do great offering 3PMSF ratings (along with M+S). Though diving deep, KO3 shows better snow performance, while Falken takes the lead on ice like terrains (which are packed up, and slicker). Other than this, both tires offer pretty decent off-road performance, with Falken AT4W excelling in most. Plus this tire also take the lead in terms of tread longevity, though lacks to its counterpart in terms of fuel economy.

Michelin Defender LTX MS2

New Michelin Defender LTX M/S2 vs LTX M/S

Each Michelin tires here presents a balanced mix of strengths, making both a strong choice depending on specific driving needs and conditions. The Defender LTX MS/2 offers superior dry performance with better traction and handling, while the Defender LTX MS/2 leads in wet traction. Moreover, the older LTX MS has the advantage in noise comfort and a smoother ride, whereas the MS/2 provides better steering feedback. And for fuel efficiency, the LTX MS is slightly better, due to lower rolling resistance. Though there is no difference when it comes to tread longevity.

Falken Wildpeak AT4w

All New Falken WildPeak AT4W vs Older AT3W – An Expert Comparison

So overall it can be seen how AT4w has improved some of the main performance aspects. I mean the tire offers improved straight-line and cornering grip. Plus it rocks off-road in almost all kinds of terrains, thanks to its greater durability and improved biting edges, along with sidewalls. And yes, it also offers superior tread life too, due to its stiffer rubber composition. Though it still lacks to AT3w in terms of wet traction, ice performance and impact comfort. Overall, there are some improvements for sure. But TBH Falken shouldn't have messed with an already great, good old AT3w. Looks like I have to declare a new winner in my list of best all-terrain tires. Back to square one. Reach out to me if you have any questions.

WeatherReady on Santa FE

Yokohama Avid Ascend GT vs Goodyear WeatherReady

So as you can see, both tires present distinct strengths and weaknesses across various performance metrics. The Avid Ascend GT excels in dry grip, handling, and noise reduction due to its optimized tread elements and design, offering a smoother and quieter ride. However, the Assurance WeatherReady shines in winter conditions with its superior snow and ice performance, attributed to its thermally adaptive rubber and specialized grooves. Other than this, both boys provide comparable wet grip and fuel efficiency, with slight advantages in specific areas due to their unique tread patterns and rubber compositions. So, needless to say, the choice between these tires depends on your specific needs and driving priorities.

Yokohama CV G058 snow testing (with Volvo XC90)

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs Michelin Defender 2

Wrapping things up, it's evident that it's difficult to pinpoint an overall better tire, as each has distinct performance advantages. The Defender 2 excels in dry conditions with superior braking and cornering, while the Geolandar CV G058 performs better in wet conditions and light snow due to effective water displacement and flexible rubber composition. Moreover, the Michelin offers lower noise and higher stability, whereas the Yokohama provides better cushioning. Additionally, the Defender has longer tread life and better fuel efficiency, which is largely due to its lighter design.

WeatherActive on Nissan Murano

Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive vs Bridgestone WeatherPeak

In the end, we see that determining the superior tire is tricky, as both excel in their respective areas. The Scorpion WeatherActive excels in dry performance and wet conditions, with superior cornering, steering response, and hydroplaning resistance. The WeatherPeak, however, has an advantage in wear resistance and fuel efficiency, due to its durable composition and lower rolling resistance. While both tires perform well in winter conditions, the Pirelli is slightly better in snow traction and the Bridgestone in handling icy surfaces.

Sumitomo HTR A/S P03 on Honda Accord

Continental DWS06+ vs Sumitomo HTR A/S P03

Well both tires have their good and bad, across various conditions, where the Continental generally outperforms its competitor. It offers better fuel efficiency and tread life due to its lighter construction and design, leading to reduced rolling resistance and wear. In wet conditions, its sophisticated siping and groove design provide superior water expulsion and resistance to hydroplaning. Despite being slightly noisier, the Continental's design minimizes noise production and enhances winter traction with its unique snow vices and multi-directional notches, offering a significant advantage in snow handling. Conversely, the Sumitomo HTR A/S P03, while quieter and capable in snow, faces challenges due to its stiffer composition and less effective water clearance, resulting in compromised wet and winter performance.

Defender 2 on Ford Escape

Yokohama Avid Ascend LX vs Michelin Defender 2

So, in summary, it's not a simple task to pick the better tire, considering the unique strengths of each in various categories. The Defender 2 excels in dry performance due to its superior directional grip and handling. However, in wet conditions, the Avid Ascend LX outperforms it, mainly due to its superior hydroplaning resistance and better siping design. Yokohama tire also takes the lead in terms of on road comfort, and winter performance. Though lacks to Michelin in terms of tread life and fuel economy and noise reduction performance.

Kleber Quadraxer 3 on RAV4.

Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

Well, let me sum it down for you. When it comes to dry performance, the Crossclimate 2 emerges as the superior tire, where it excels particularly in terms of braking. And although it doesn't excel in cornering grip, it still maintains a slight edge over the Kleber. Speaking of which, while the Quadraxer tire offers a smoother and quieter ride thanks to its softer rubber composition, it falls short in wet traction and winter performance compared to the Crossclimate 2. Both tires perform decently in winter conditions, but here again the Michelin outperforms in critical areas, enhancing its appeal for those seeking a reliable all-season option. Also despite the higher cost, the Michelin's superior performance and tread longevity suggest a better overall value, making it a better choice for those prioritizing quality and long-term efficiency.

Continental CrossContact LX25

Michelin Latitude Tour HP vs Continental CrossContact LX25

Overall, while both tires have their strengths, the CrossContact LX25 stands out for its versatile performance across various conditions, making it a more reliable choice for SUV owners. Though the Michelin Latitude Tour HP does offer superior dry performance with its elongated ribs and dense central tread, providing excellent directional grip and braking. But yes, it falls short in wet and winter conditions due to its stiffer composition. And this stiffer rubber of this tire also puts it behind in terms of road comfort performance as well.

Maxlife on Nissan Rouge

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs Goodyear Assurance MaxLife

In conclusion, both tires have their good and bad. The MaxLife excels in dry conditions, showcasing superior linear grip and handling due to its minimal tread design, robust support, and lighter construction, leading to exceptional braking and overall dry performance. Whereas in wet conditions, the Geolandar CV G058 edges out with better aquaplaning resistance and wet traction, thanks to its interconnected grooves and full-depth siping, which also allows it to excel on snowy terrains too. For ride comfort, the MaxLife is quieter and provides a stable feel, while the Geolandar offers better road smoothness due to its softer composition. And in terms of tread longevity and fuel efficiency, the MaxLife's design contributes to its extended lifespan and reduced rolling resistance.

PureContact LS on Tucson

Yokohama Avid Ascend GT vs Continental PureContact LS

In summarizing the comprehensive comparison between the two tires here, it's evident that each tire exhibits distinct strengths across various performance metrics. The Yokohama excels in dry conditions with superior directional grip and handling, providing a robust and reliable driving experience. It also shines in winter scenarios with its optimized design for snow and cold temperatures. On the other hand, the Continental PureContact LS outperforms in wet conditions, offering superior wet traction and hydroplaning resistance due to its efficient groove structure and softer tread compound. It also leads in overall ride comfort, with advanced technology that ensures a quieter and smoother journey. Moreover, while the Yokohama offers slightly better tread longevity and similar fuel efficiency, the Continental's focus on luxury and sport provides a well-rounded and comfortable driving experience.

1 … 4 5 6 … 49