While it's strongly advised to thoroughly read the preceding content, given its well-researched nature, for those pressed for time, allow me to summarize the key points discussed above. The Mickey Thompson Deegan 38 does better in the following departments. Sand performance. Rocks. Muddy terrains. Whereas the Baja ATZ did better in following. Winter grip. On-road traction. Comfort performance.
We strongly suggest not overlooking any of the content above, as it's been meticulously researched. Nonetheless, for busy readers, here's a quick recapitulation of the main points addressed. When it comes to these (following) particular performance measures, the Hankook Dynapro MT2 stands out as a top performer. Wet grip. Winter traction. Sand traction. Rocky terrain grip. Fuel economy On the other hand, the Toyo Open Country MT Road noise. Tread life. Dry grip. Both tires have similar traction on muddy terrains.
Given the substantial research behind the information above, it's highly encouraged to review it in its entirety. However, for those with time constraints, I'll provide a condensed overview of the key points. The Milestar Patagonia MT showcases exceptional prowess in the following performance categories. Sand grip. Wet grip. Impact comfort. Fuel economy On the other hand, the Cooper Discoverer STT Pro Grip on rocks. Mud performance. Tread life. Tread noise. Snow traction. Dry grip.
Although bypassing the previous content isn't recommended, as it's the result of rigorous research, I understand that some readers may be short on time. Here's a concise breakdown of everything I discussed. The Toyo Open Country M/T outperforms its competitors in these specific areas of performance. Mud grip. Rocky terrain traction. On-road noise. Tread life. On the other hand, the Milestar Patagonia MT offers better; Wet grip. Fuel economy. Winter traction. Impact comfort. And sand traction.
It's important not to skip any of the information provided earlier, as it's based on extensive research. However, for the convenience of those in a rush, I'll distill the essential points covered above. The Toyo Open Country M/T demonstrates remarkable performance in the following aspects. Sand traction. Winter performance. Wet grip. Fuel economy. On the other hand, the Atturo Trail Blade MT is better in following. Rock performance. Mud traction. Tread life. On-road noise. Dry grip.
Although its not recommended that you miss out on any of the abvoe, as a lot of research went in to this, for the folks who are in a hurry, let me break down all of the above I discussed. The Toyo Open Country M/T does better in the following departments. Dry traction. Mud traction Quietness of ride. Fuel economy Whereas the Nexen Roadian is superior in following key performance areas. Wet traction. Winter performance Absorption to bumps. Both tires have similar sandy and rocky terrain performance.
The BF Goodrich KM3 features very effective siping, providing superior winter and wet traction, in comparison, and off-road the tire yields better sand and mud grip. In comparison, the Hankook Dynapro MT2 delivers better dry grip, with faster steering response, and the tire also offers relatively better comfort. Moreover, it's fuel efficiency is also greater compared to its counterpart.
Kumho Road Venture AT52 although features a better dry grip, it lacks to its competitor on wet roads. Moreover, the tire is a better choice if you are considering fuel and tread life, as it generates lower rolling resistance values. On the other hand, the Yokohama Geolandar G015 is one of the best tires out there (in A/T category), when it comes to comfort. This is mainly due to its softer compound, which is also great on muddy terrains. Though it can't keep up as much on sand and rocks, relatively speaking.
Both tires, from different categories produce different set of results. The TerrainContact H/T features a superior pavement traction, and supplies better on-road comfort, fuel efficiency and tread life. Whereas the TerrainContact A/T does better off-road on all types of terrains, and supplies amazing tread life considering LT sizes. Furthermore, it's all season compound also supplies better winter traction on deeper terrains.
So as discussed above in detail, both tires have their good and bad. The Firestone X/T comes with a malleable compound providing you with greater wet road stability and traction, and staying soft on snowy terrains (featuring 3 peak mountain snowflake rating unlike its competitor). Moreover it's off-road traction is also superior, as seen in almost all terrain types. The Bridgestone Dueler AT Revo 3, in comparison, provides better dry traction, and steering response, and supplies you with a much quieter ride. Moreover, it's fuel and tread economy is also seen slightly better.
Goodyear Wrangler AT/S, is although slightly more aggressive than its counterpart, the tire still manages to supply you with superior wet and winter performance (on pavements). And of course, off-road it's definitely a much better pick, as it offers much nicer rocky, muddy and sandy terrain traction. The Goodyear TrailMark on the other hand, does great when it comes to dry highway grip, steering response, and it's fuel economy, tread life, and comfort is also ranking better as well.
Hankook Dynapro ATM lacks to its counterpart in the on-road traction section, but only in dry conditions, as on wet, it's grip and handling efficacy is superior. Moreover, the tire is a better pick off the two, when it comes to rugged terrains, like sand, rocks, gravel and even a little bit of mud. Goodyear Wrangler Adventure is generally a better on-road tire, as besides traction, it also gives out better fuel economy, tread life and comfort performance. Though in terms of winter performance, it lacks to its counterpart, even though both tires have 3 peak mountain snowflake ratings.