Ozmen photo

Tire reviews & comparisons

Ozmen

Hi Folks. I'm Ozmen, and I work as a tire designer. I understand finding a tire isn't easy, as there are so many variables involved. But with me around, tire selection would never bother you again.

Continental PureContact LS

Continental PureContact LS vs ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus

After a thorough examination of both tires across various performance metrics, it's evident that both boys have their strengths and weaknesses. The Continental PureContact LS shines in terms of fuel efficiency, tread noise reduction, ride smoothness, and tread longevity, showcasing advanced technologies like EcoPlus and Comfort Plus. Whereas, the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus stands out in dry and wet performance due to its advanced tread design, offering superior grip and handling. However, note that these are very impressive and the tire trades off some comfort and fuel efficiency for these attributes.

Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady

Continental TrueContact Tour vs Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady

So overall, each tire offers distinct advantages, so the ideal selection would vary based on your requirements. The Continental TrueContact Tour shines in areas like steering feedback, fuel efficiency, and noise reduction. In contrast, the Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady demonstrates superior capabilities in traction on both wet and winter terrains and offers smoother bump absorption.

Cooper Endeavor Plus

Cooper Endeavor Plus vs Michelin Defender 2

After a detailed comparison, here's a concise summary of the strengths and weaknesses. The Michelin Defender 2 excels in dry performance, tread life, fuel efficiency, and noise reduction due to its dense lug design and harder compound. Conversely, the Cooper Endeavor Plus offers better traction in wet and snowy terrains, with its flexible sipes and effective notches, and ensures a smoother ride, but it doesn't match up in terms of noise insulation and fuel efficiency. So your choice will ultimately depend on your specific driving conditions and preferences, of course.

Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive

Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive vs AS Plus 3

So overall, both tires exhibit distinct strengths. The Pirelli WeatherActive excels in dry longitudinal traction, wet water evacuation, winter performance, and road comfort due to its unique tread design and soft compound. Conversely, the Pirelli Scorpion AS Plus 3 showcases commendable lateral grip in dry conditions, noise dampening abilities, and a potential edge in fuel efficiency and longevity as indicated by its higher UTQG rating. So despite their individual advantages in specific areas, they both are great overall, and you can't go wrong with either one of them.

Michelin Primacy Tour A/S

Michelin Primacy Tour A/S Review

The Michelin Primacy Tour A/S offers a mixed bag of performance. In dry conditions, it stands out with exceptional grip and steering feedback, thanks to its rigid rubber composition and tailored tread design. However, its performance dips in wet conditions, notably lacking in lateral water evacuation and wet grip. In snowy conditions, it falls behind, but surprisingly excels on icy terrains due to its efficient siping. And despite it having an average fuel economy and tread mileage, the tire shines in noise comfort and provides a commendable ride experience.

Michelin Crossclimate 2

Firestone WeatherGrip vs Michelin Crossclimate 2

So what's the verdict? Well, we have a mixed bag of results here. I mean, in dry conditions, the Michelin excels in braking while its peer showcases superior lateral grip. And for winter performance, while the Firestone stands out on icy surfaces, its competitor performs better on snow. Regarding wet conditions, Michelin offers enhanced grip and handling. And yes its a quieter out of the two as well. And as for tread life and fuel efficiency, the WeatherGrip has a slight edge in longevity, and economy.

Pirelli Scorpion AS Plus 3

Pirelli Scorpion AS Plus 3 vs Michelin Latitude Tour HP

So overall, both tires offer various strengths and areas for improvement. The Michelin excels in dry conditions, particularly in directional grip and cornering, thanks to its tread design and rigid construction. However, it struggles in wet conditions and noise dampening. The Pirelli, on the other hand, demonstrates great wet traction and hydroplaning resistance due to its siping design and deeper tread depth. Its softer rubber composition provides superior noise insulation and smoother rides over minor road imperfections. Yet, it takes a slight hit in managing larger impacts, where its competitor is more stable. Speaking of which, the Michelin also offers superior durability, though its superior grip results in greater rolling resistance which puts it back in terms of fuel and tread economy.

Falken Wildpeak RT

Falken Wildpeak RT vs Mickey Thompson Baja Boss AT

So overall both tires are doing great in a lot of different performance sections. The Baja Boss A/T excels in winter conditions due to its thermally adaptive rubber and narrow section width, along with superior wet and dry grip. In contrast, the Wildpeak RT showcases strength in rock climbing and sand terrains, attributed to its superior lug interconnectivity and lightweight build. And yes, durability-wise, both tires stand on equal footing, showcasing robust protection against sidewall punctures.

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4

Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS06+

In my comprehensive review, both boys exhibit strengths across various terrains and conditions. In a head-to-head comparison, the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 excels in dry braking and wet performance braking, while the Continental ExtremeContact DWS06 Plus shines in handling and steering response. And for winter, although neither tire has the 3-Peak Mountain Snowflake certification, Michelin takes the lead, overall, while its peer does pretty great in the snow department. Moreover, both tires offers similar performance in terms of tread life and fuel efficiency, with Continental having a slight edge in durability. For ride comfort, Michelin offers a more cushioned ride, but both tires have almost similar noise levels.

Cooper Cobra Radial GT

Cooper Cobra Radial G/T Review

The Cooper Cobra Radial G/T is a tire with distinct strengths and weaknesses. In terms of dry performance, it offers commendable grip and superior steering feedback, with a clear emphasis on consistency and quick response. When it comes to wet conditions, the tire showcases excellent hydroplaning resistance but falls short in wet grip due to issues related to siping design and tread composition. And yes, winter traction isn't one of the tire's strong suits either, and that's mainly due to its harder compound, lack of biters, and wider grooves. Tread life is another area where the tire doesn't shine as brightly, though its fuel economy is ok. Sound comfort, is just barely okay, where its bumps comfort needs improvement.

Bridgestone Dueler HL Alenza

Bridgestone Dueler HL Alenza Plus Review

Here's to the point things to keep in mind with this tire. Overall Dry Performance: Provides adequate sideways and straight grip but tends to understeer in tight corners. Overall Wet Performance: Offers decent braking and traction, but has poor steering precision. Its hydroplaning capabilities are satisfactory though. Winter Traction: Presents a commendable performance with good grip even in icy conditions, backed by its functional polymers. Tread Wearing Rate: Has above average longevity, benefiting from its lightweight construction and an optimized contact patch. Fuel Consumption: Faces challenges due to its larger tread depth. Feel of Ride: Stands out for its exceptionally quiet ride and excellent road comfort, supported by its varied pitch patterns, and rubber compound.

Bridgestone Turanza QuietTrack

Bridgestone Turanza QuietTrack Review

The Bridgestone Turanza QuietTrack is a tire designed for high performance across various parameters. In terms of dry performance, it excels due to its directional grip provided by three optimized central ribs. When cornering, the tire's design focuses on the shoulder area, leveraging the effects of centripetal force. Steering responsiveness is another forte of the Turanza QuietTrack, reacting promptly to driver inputs due to its lightweight structure. However, it's not all rosy; the tire's wet performance is subpar compared to its competitors, where it also gets a somewhat delayed steering response. In snowy conditions, the tire presents a mix; good lateral traction and steering feedback but is hampered by its braking ability. Moreover, its tread life is noteworthy, boasting an 80k mile warranty, attributed to its lightweight construction and reinforced lugs. And its fuel efficiency also stands out due to its minimized rolling resistance. And lastly, the tire is pretty comfortable, offering a quiet and smooth ride experience.